March 24, 2019

In this article, we explore what insanity is, how it differs across the United States, and how forensic evaluators gather information related to insanity.

A brief overview of what a forensic psychologist does including a list of evaluation referral questions and the psychologist's role.

March 15, 2017

This article gives a short overview of issues with juvenile competence to waive Miranda rights and summarizes major findings from a 2016 study.

Bipolar disorder is misdiagnosed for many reasons: financial benefit, clinician inexperience, insufficient resources, favored diagnoses, and diagnostic overlap.

February 27, 2017

Though a criminal responsibility or insanity defense may be advantageous to the defense in many instances, this is not always the case. In some cases, such a defense may mean the defendant spends more time in jail or under supervision than if they had pleaded guilty.

February 12, 2017

There are six major ways to learn more about forensic psychology: (1) books, (2) forums and listservs, (3) conferences and workshops, (4) hands-on clinical experience and observation, (5) review forensic psychologists' websites, and (6) scientific research.

January 22, 2017

In this article, I explain what a neuropsychological evaluation includes, what it measures, for whom it is most helpful, and how it may benefit you.

October 5, 2016

Those who are mentally ill at the time of the commission of a crime may be found “insane” or not guilty by reason of insanity (or mental disease or defect, depending on jurisdiction). Rather than going to prison, the individual is sent to a hospital where they receive treatment. Individuals who are found guilty may face life in prison or even the death penalty. So is the insanity defense fair? Is the insanity defense necessary? Based on the consequences (prison vs. hospitalization) of a criminal act, there might seem to be an unfair bias toward those with mental illness. It may also seem that those with mental illness are using their symptoms as an empty justification for the crimes they have committed. So why is the insanity defense allowed?

To put it simply, people are typically punishe...

There are several key ways in which statutes relevant to mental health evaluations and testimony differ between Arkansas and Federal jurisdictions. I will describe these below:

  1. When can an expert testify? The Federal Rules of Evidence Rule 72 states a witness may testify in the form of an opinion or otherwise if: (a) the expert’s scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will help the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue; (b) the testimony is based on sufficient facts or data; (c) the testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods; and (d) the expert has reliably applied the principles and methods to the facts of the case. Conversely, Arkansas statute applies a lower threshold, allowing an expert to testify only so long as t...

Clinical and forensic work differs in nine major ways: referral source, client, confidentiality, consent, relationship, malingering, setting, perspective, and relevance.

Please reload

Featured Posts

What is Insanity?

March 24, 2019

Please reload

Recent Posts

March 24, 2019

Please reload

Please reload

Search By Tags